Although there are more algae sequences available now than ever before, the quality of the genomic data published in literature is increasingly inconsistent and full of gaps and mistakes. This lack of quality can misrepresent what genes—and functions—are available in a given species.
Los Alamos National Laboratory scientists, with the support of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) reviewed the current state of public databases and the accepted methodology for assessing genomes.